Skip to content

Women in preservation: the real meaning of “house keeping”?

October 14, 2010

Daughters of Revolution, by Grant Wood, in the collection of the Cincinnati Art Museum

Little old ladies in tennis shoes.  (Also known as “LOLITaS” I’ve been told.)

Junior League, Colonial Dames, Daughters of the American Revolution.

Heiresses with a connection to place.

Women are not just the sprinkles on top of the confection that is preservation of place, they are key ingredients.  You might see them as berry swirls of red, white and blue considering the patriotic connections and motivations of days gone by.  Yet, far too often, they are the unsung heroines.

Is there something about the female personality that lends itself to the connective, communicative requirements for preservation success?

For years (and even today) women were supposed to know their place was in the home or in the mill or typing pool.  Women’s biographies tended toward birth, marriage, children, death because what more of value was there to report?  Even at historic sites with compelling women’s history, the tendency is to tell the tale from the man’s point of view, and the house is named for the man who owned it.

For example:

Barrett Wendell (1855-1921), one of Jacob Wendell II’s four sons, inherited the Portsmouth home in 1917 and lived there after his retirement from Harvard University. A well known scholar of English literature, he traveled extensively with his wife, Edith Greenough Wendell (1859-1938).  She was very active in local and state organizations.

The end.

Active in local and state organizations“?  Well, the real story is that without Edith Greenough Wendell, one of the finest mansions in New England would be the site of a gas station today.

Here’s to  “Women who saved the day (and the house)” and the story of Edith Wendell’s “house-keeping,” which saved Portsmouth, New Hampshire’s extraordinary Macphaedris-Warner House, built 1716-18 and designated a National Historic Landmark in 1960.

Mrs. Wendell lived in the Wendell ancestral home (1789) on Pleasant Street — a house stuffed with family heirlooms and antiques that might have made an ideal house museum.  The Wendell Family had a strong sense of documenting its own history, as well as a compelling urge to preserve the heritage of Portsmouth.  (Read this fascinating article about the Wendell antiques in the Strawbery Banke collection written by Gerald W. R. Ward and Karen E. Cullity.)

Early in the 20th century, the seaside town began to see changes.  The waterfront saw significant commercial development.  By 1923 traffic increased with completion of the Memorial Bridge spanning the Piscataqua River to connect Portsmouth to Kittery, Maine.  A filling station replaced the Judge John Sherburne House.  The same fate might have befallen Warner House (1716-18) at the corner of Daniel and Chapel Streets  if not for Mrs. Wendell.

In 1931 with the country still reeling from the ’29 stock market crash, Mrs. Wendell raised $10,000 for the rescue purchase of Warner House.

Named for Captain Archibald Macpheadris who built the house in 1716-18 and for  Portsmouth merchant Jonathan Warner, the house is one of the earliest and most elegant brick mansion houses in New England.   The dramatic wall murals, featuring Native Americans, are the oldest colonial wall paintings still in place in the United States.   The Warner House opened its doors to the visiting public in 1932 and has served the community as a house museum ever since.

In 1937, William Appleton (founder of the Society for the Preservation of New England Antiquities, now Historic New England) described her effort as “one of the most remarkable instances of preservation work in America.”

Today, like so many historic house museums across the country, the Warner House works hard to maintain the National Historic Landmark building and its collections and may be negatively affected by construction work connected with replacement of the nearby Memorial Bridge (1922).

Will the ladies of Portsmouth and Kittery come to the rescue once again?

 

Advertisements
3 Comments leave one →
  1. October 14, 2010 3:46 pm

    Sabra I am glad you brought this up as the role of women in the HP movement has had some highlighting from time to time. In 1994 I worked with Cindy Little and Barbara Irvine to plan the first Restoring Women’s History through Historic Preservation conference held at Bryn Mawr College. I know there have been at least three conferences since then, but have seen nothing on this topic in years either in the preservation press, or conference topics. Has it been “done” and no one is interested any longer? Or have a generation of preservationists interested in the movement’s past, retired? I am excited about what Tony Wood is doing in New York City in collecting oral histories of preservation luminaries. The NY Preservation Archive Project–I blogged about this project recently–see it at http://heritageconsultinginc.wordpress.com/2010/10/07/worrying-about-our-own-history/But I wonder in the end how many female preservation leaders have been included in his archives? Donna Ann Harris

  2. Sabra Smith permalink*
    October 14, 2010 4:28 pm

    Donna — I considered doing my thesis on the history of historic preservation (but Randy Mason had just published a book on the topic, so it seemed a bit redundant…) — the topic I ended up choosing led me to the histories of some of the women’s groups that rallied to save the homes of Important Patriots, Signers of Big Documents, and, of course, Presidents. So often it was groups of women doing all the saving and yet, touring the sites, you rarely hear that story. For the thesis I ended up pursuing, I proposed that Patriot Mayor Samuel Powel’s House would be so much more compelling as a women’s history story about his wife Elizabeth (who loved to meddle in politics) on through the story of how Frances Wister saved the building from demolition.

    I was thrilled to learn about NYPAP’s innovative efforts to document and record oral histories of NY’s preservation past. It’s also magnificent that technology today makes it possible for them to gather and share so much of it online. (Reading Diana Goldstein’s interview is a wonderful snippet of time and place.)

    Though not nearly as comprehensive an effort, I’m hoping to share some of what I uncover here and honor women like Penny Batcheler and Carolyn Pitts who had such remarkable lives and made such important contributions to preservation. On my list is a “book” created for Carolyn’s memorial that includes outraged letters from VIPs about her preservation activities as well as articles recognizing her dogged efforts to document and preserve the Victorian architecture of Cape May.

    [Don’t know if you watch “Mad Men” on AMC, but I was amused by the nod of recognition they gave to women’s groups of the period when the housewives gather their energies to protect a natural area and kill a proposed incinerator project. Behold the evolving power of women.]

Trackbacks

  1. Friday Links « Preservation in Pink

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: